DIA 2024 Global Annual Meeting

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate
CE: ACPE 1.00 Knowledge UAN: 0286-0000-24-561-L04-P; CME 1.00; RN 1.00

Integrating patient-experience data (PED) in medicines regulation for better patient-centered outcomes is a priority for medicines regulators, including the FDA and the EU network. The FDA’s program on patient-focused drug development (PFDD) has yielded 4 scientific guidelines on PED, while in the EU work is ongoing to produce a reflection paper outlining pathways for progress, marking an initial step toward smoother PED integration in medicine development. The session will present the US and EU's position in this regard and draw on the experience in applying existing guidance to date.

Learning Objectives

Describe the work done by FDA’s Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) program on scientific guidelines on patient-experience data (PED), challenges and future outlook; Describe how work is progressing in the EU to foster the generation and use of patient-experience data in medicines regulatory decision-making.

Chair

Steffen Thirstrup, MD, PhD

Speaker

Co-Chair
Robyn Bent, MS, RN

US Patient Representative
Karin Hoelzer, DVM, PhD

EMA Update
Juan Garcia-Burgos, MD, PhD

EMA Update
Rosa Gonzalez-Quevedo

US Industry Representative
Maria Apostolaros, JD, PharmD, MS, RPh

EU Industry Representative
Solange Corriol-Rohou, DrMed, MD, PhD

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate
CE: ACPE 1.00 Knowledge UAN: 0286-0000-24-579-L04-P; CME 1.00; RN 1.00

This session will discuss the results from two separate international industry experience surveys; one on Project Orbis and another on the Access Consortium. Results will cover industry experiences, and recommendations for changes.

Learning Objectives

Recognize the benefits and challenges of international collaborative initiatives from industry perspectives; Discuss the recommendations to improve these schemes; Describe how to influence your own organization to adopt or increase usage of these schemes.

Chair

Sarah Powell, RAC

Speaker

Results of Industry Survey of Orbis Projects
Sarah Powell, RAC

Results of Industry Survey on Access Program
Tse Siang Kang, PhD

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate
CE: ACPE 1.00 Knowledge UAN: 0286-0000-24-603-L04-P; CME 1.00; RN 1.00

This session will bring regulators and industry quality experts together to explore how quality management systems can be developed to meet the challenges real-world evidence presents to QA activities and regulatory inspection expectations.

Learning Objectives

Evaluate quality challenges associated with the use of real-world evidence as part of regulatory studies; Discuss how to apply proportionate risk-based quality assurance activities which meet regulatory expectations.

Chair

Andrew Gray, PhD

Speaker

FDA Update
L'Oreal Walker

FDA Update
Lee H. Pai-Scherf, MD

Industry Perspective
Abi Seifert, MBA

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate
CE: ACPE 1.00 Knowledge UAN: 0286-0000-24-617-L04-P; CME 1.00; RN 1.00

This session will describe the evolution of remote regulatory assessments (RRA’s), FDA’s authority to conduct an RRA in lieu of an inspection, the process for conducting an RRA, and recent RRAs conducted as part of the FY23 BIMO program

Learning Objectives

Describe what a remote regulatory assessments is and FDA’s authority to conduct a remote regulatory assessment; Describe the steps taken by the agency and site before, during, and after a remote regulatory assessment is conducted; Discuss FY23 metrics including recently conducted remote regulatory assessments.

Chair

Jan Hewett, BSN, JD

Speaker

FDA Update
Kavita C. Dada, PharmD, RAC

Health Canada Update
Jennifer Evans

Industry Perspective on Remote Assessments
James Riddle

Component Type: Session
Level: Intermediate
CE: ACPE 1.00 Knowledge UAN: 0286-0000-24-656-L04-P; CME 1.00; RN 1.00

Model Informed Drug Development (MIDD) can enhance the efficiency of drug development and regulatory decision-making. The ICH M15 guideline aims to enable the further integration and consistent use of MIDD. This session will cover the draft guideline in greater detail.

Learning Objectives

Discuss the draft guideline and what may be new to drug developers and the regulatory community, including the concept of a risk-based assessment, the value of multidisciplinary team alignment on MIDD strategy, and early alignment with regulators; Identify current approaches, best practices, and future opportunities to enhance development and decision-making.

Chair

Erin Greene, JD

Speaker

Industry Perspective
Malidi Ahamadi

Regulatory Perspective
Hao Zhu, PhD

Industry Perspective
Mark C. Peterson, PhD